Friday, September 28, 2007

What was Martin Jol thinking of?


Beleaguered Tottenham manager Martin Jol claims that only Arsenal come close to matching his record for introducing talented youngsters onto the first-team stage since he took over at White Hart Lane.

Of course Jol, who succeeded Jacques Santini as Spurs manager three years ago, has spent heavily in the transfer market i that time. But he says his biggest kick is watching Tottenham's youngsters into stars.

And he believes that the young players who have taken Arsenal to the top of the Premier League are no better than his own crop of young players, even though Spurs are currently in the bottom three.

Quoted in The Sun, Jol said: “I feel we have more talented players at Tottenham than any other club. Maybe only Arsenal have the same but their approach is different to mine.

“If you were fickle you would say it is the same for both clubs, but it isn’t. It’s totally different.

“Gael Clichy has been playing at Arsenal for years, getting used to his role behind Ashley Cole before he moved on. Then he comes into the team after a couple of years of preparation.

“Cesc Fabregas was there for three or four years. They were all on the bench and came on when things were going well.

“If your team is in a position where you are playing well and then you bring on, for example, Kevin-Prince Boateng or Adel Taarabt, it’s an easy decision to make.

“Sometimes you have to play them no matter what.

"I felt I had to play Gareth Bale because he is a good option. The same goes for Younes Kaboul. Against Middlesbrough I played Michael Dawson, 22, Kaboul, 20, Bale, 18. That is probably the difference with the big clubs.

“Kaboul, Boateng and Bale didn’t play in the Premier League until this season. Hopefully they will develop into very good players.”

Having been criticised for Tottenham's early-season results, which have pushed the tarhget of Champions League football some way into the distance, Jol said defensively: “It’s not always about the scoreboard. It’s about the development of players like Kaboul, Bale and Aaron Lennon.

“It’s been a bad start, but it’s not as bad as it seems. Nothing is as it seems in football.

“I have to combine the results with the development. Even at Arsenal that is not the case.

“I can mention five or six players who chose to come to Tottenham ahead of other clubs.

“When you buy players, especially young players, you’ve got to play them.

“Look at my team and you will see examples of young players getting the right opportunity here.

“If they see Tom Huddlestone, Lennon and Dawson playing, it is a good example for what someone new can achieve.

“How many years will it take them to develop? What are you on about — we finished fifth last year.

“My philosophy is to get players young, get them used to Spurs and the Premier League.”

No doubt Arsene Wenger would query Jol's assertion that Arsenal do not have to combine results with development.

Critics would also point out that while Tottenham do indeed have some talented young players - though many of them such as Bale, Kaboul, Lennon, Dawson and Huddlestone were bought expensively rather than scouted as unknown youngsters and nurtured through the academy - they do not yet play together as a successful team unit, as the league table confirms. That is a key difference between Tottenham and Arsenal at the moment.

Jermain Defoe might also be surprised by Jol's comment that, if you buy young players, you have got to play them - Source: Goal.com accessible at http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=428607


Perhaps, this is one of the more mundane posts, and it is about most guys' favorite topic - soccer. Apparently, I read during the wee hours of the morning that Monsieur Jol of Tottenham Hotspurs had seemingly claimed that Spurs' youngsters are as good as Arsenal's youngsters. I don't know how will Monsieur Wenger reply to Jol's remarks, but I figure Jol's words will be like a red cloth teasing the most bullish of supporters from both the white and red side of North London.

First and foremost, I would like to qualify myself as a neutral fan, who supports good attacking soccer. Maybe, I may sound biased towards Arsenal, but this is justified based on the free flowing football that Arsenal produces week in week out. If I was born earlier, I might have loved the generation of Spurs players spearheaded by the likes of Oswaldo Ardiles in the 1980s.

One of my initial impression of Jol's remarks is that he has to get a grip of things, and be able to segregate his vision from reality. Jol has done a whole world of good during the time he has been in charge, transforming Spurs from a mid-table team to one that finishes within the top 5 of the English Premier League. From the aforementioned excerpts, I believe Jol has a vision of watching his youngsters develop into future stars. However, realistically speaking, the youngsters at Arsenal are operating at a different plateau as compared to the ones at Spurs.

Firstly, Jol has erroneously pointed out that Arsenal bloods her youngsters when things are going well. That is not really true exactly. The Carling Cup has always been the platform used by Wenger to springboard the progress of his youngsters, and he has never shied away from fielding his fledglings against Premier League sides in the Carling Cup, even more during last season's amazing run to the Carling Cup final, when he stuck by his youngsters against the megastars of Chelsea. Even the neutrals were won over by the fact that the Wengerboys played the diamond-studded stars of Chelsea off the park during certain spells of the match. The Wengerboys had a measure of success of their own, claiming scalps against Premier League sides like Liverpool, Tottenham, and just this week, Newcastle.

Secondly, Jol has to realise the crucial factor of success building on success during the development of youngsters. The Arsenal team has successfully qualified for the UEFA Champions league every season. I would argue that participation in the UEFA Champions League will steepen the learning curve of many a youngster, a luxury that Wenger's youngsters enjoy. Indeed, for a youngster to test himself against Europe's elites, his exposure to the brand of soccer played by the other top sides in Europe and in facing world class players will surely broaden his horizon. I believe players like Gael Clichy, Cesc Fabregas, Theo Walcott, etc have been put through a steep learning curve on European nights. The burgeoning maturity of Wenger's youngsters culminated in their run to the UEFA Champions league final in 2005, with Cesc Fabregas stepping ably into Patrick Viera's shoes. This is why I believe that Arsenal's youngsters operate on a different plateau from Spur's youngsters.

Perhaps, Martin Jol needs a bit more time at Spurs in order to see his vision come into fruition. Wenger has been at Arsenal for more than 10 years and the entire club echoes his brand of footballing ethos from the boardroom to the football pitch. Arsenal's senior team, composed of a group of youngsters plays a triangular form of short passing game that is attractive to watch. The reserve team composed of another group of youngsters plays similarly. The youngsters could fit into the game that the senior team plays. The Arsenal forward, Nicklaus Bendtner, gave an apt epitomy of the Arsenal game - it's about passing and moving. This is not true in the case of Spurs whereby Bale, Kaboul, Dawson, Huddlestone and Lennon who have yet to show that they can click as a successful team unit. Wenger also had the support of the Arsenal boardroom, and his influence of "buying a player and moulding him the Arsenal way" is rather infectious. It is quite obvious that Wenger buys and selects players according to the system that he believes in, which is one of the reasons why his youngsters do not have much of a problem fitting into his team.

Another aspect of Wenger is his proven reputation in youth development. The work of Wenger's talent scouts such as Gilles Grimandi cannot be underestimated. George Weah, Thierry Henry, Patrick Viera and now Cesc Fabregas are among the products of Wenger's development. Young footballers cite Wenger as being the magnet behind their desire to move to Emirates.

It appears that Jol needs more time and other ingredients for his remarks to turn into reality.


Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Spoofed interview with Celine Dion by Weird Al Yankovic

Weird Al Yankovic is an immensely talented musician, a one of a kind, whom in my honest opinion really owns the domain of song parody. Who would have forgotten his parody song of Michael Jackson's Bad - Fat, or his comical rapping to the tunes of Gangster's Paradise in Amish Paradise?

Notwithstanding his singing talents, he is also known for conducting spoofed interviews in his very own Al TV. Contemporary artistes alike are being projected in an awkward fashion, through their past recorded responses which were superimposed onto Al's hilarious jibes and queries. He claimed a "victim" in Celine Dion. Enjoy his "interview" with Celine Dion.

Changing the template of my blog

I have just received feedback from my students that my blog looked rather bland. Hence, I adjusted the background of my blog using a downloaded image of the Aurora Borealis (the Northern Lights), a beautiful and captivating natural phenomenon. Hopefully, it gives my blog a more colourful, albeit mystifying feel.

Monday, September 24, 2007

The eldest child is the smartest!

I found an interesting article in the International Herald Tribune, and it was found that the eldest child score on average three points higher than his/her other siblings in IQ tests. The reason is due to family dynamics rather than biological factors, e.g. changes in gestation processes. I guess the pressure is on the eldest to learn as much as possible about life in general, in order to guide his/her younger siblings. For those who are the eldest, do rejoice over the fact that you may be more intelligent. For those whom are not the eldest, you can always seek the counsel of your eldest sibling! Be comforted that you have your eldest sibling around to hold your hands and guide you through obstacles when you need him/her the most!


Citations

Benedict Carey. Family dynamics, not biology, behind higher IQ. International Herald Tribune accessible at http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/21/africa/siblings.php

Life Science queries

Students in my lessons, feel free to voice whatever queries, thoughts or views you may have during your course. I will try to respond ASAP. Remember no vulgarities, personal attacks, flaming or anything that is detrimental to the discussion.

Cancer, metastasis and the entire business of vesicle trafficking


Vesicle trafficking plays a part in cellular processes. Vesicles are formed, undergo expansion and completion, and finally participating in lysosomal degradation. Vesicles are involved in this process known as autophagy. Autophagosomes are double-membrane vesicles. In a paper published by Takahashi et al in Nature Cell Biology, it was found that Bif-1 interacts with Beclin-1, and together with ATG-5, is involved in the formation of autophagosomes. Loss of Bif-1 led to abrogation of autophagy, and the arising of spontaneous tumours in mice (Takahashi et al, 2007). It was also found that during the process of carcinogenesis in mice, there was reduced autophagic activity (Schwarze and Seglen, 1985). Indeed, it's interesting to note the part played by vesicle trafficking pathways in tumorigenesis. Vesicle trafficking pathways may play a part in metastasis. Jiang et al has found that the regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-1 activity was achieved by dynamin-mediated endocytosis (Jiang et al, 2001). The study of vesicle trafficking pathways in cancer and metastatic cells will gives us insights into how they actually assist in the latter's functions.


Citations

1) Yoshinori Takahashi, Domenico Coppola, Norimasa Matsushita, Hernani D. Cualing, Mei Sun, Yuya Sato, Chengyu Liang, Jae U. Jung, Jin Q. Cheng, James J. Mul, W. Jack Pledger & Hong-Gang Wang. Bif-1 interacts with Beclin 1 through UVRAG and regulates autophagy and tumorigenesis. Nature Cell Biology, 23 Septemter 2007

2) Schwarze, P. E. & Seglen, P. O. Reduced autophagic activity, improved protein balance and enhanced in vitro survival of hepatocytes isolated from carcinogen-treated rats. Exp. Cell Res. 157, 15–28 (1985)

3) Jiang A, Lehti K, Wang X, Weiss SJ, Keski-Oja J, Pei D. Regulation of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase 1 activity by dynamin-mediated endocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 20;98(24):13693-8.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Really stranger than friction


Read an article in Times about the trial of Krystian Bala, a novelist of a macabre best seller, containing a story of a murder of which he was responsible for three years ago. He murdered a lover of his former wife. Apparently, the murder victim was tortured to death, presumably by asphyxiation and drowning, whereby a noose was tied around his neck and he was being thrown into a river. A similar account of the murder was written in a book published by Bala titled Amok.

Yet, this account of a crime involving a jealous lover was a poignant reminder to me. During my college days, I was mistaken by a jealous fellow as a boyfriend of a female friend who was my orientation group mate. Yes, I treated her as a friend, but no more than that. This guy actually claimed that I looked like a playboy and told a martial arts-trained friend of his to fix me. It happened that this martial arts trained friend of his was also my friend too. It was from the latter that I found out what happened.

Guess when one is in the deeper throes of passion does he lose his rationality.

Citations
Jail for author of ‘a perfect crime’

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2395523.ece

Sunday, September 16, 2007

The driving force of morality


It has been put forth by Creationists that one of the driving force for the existence of a god is the existence and nature of morality. My first response to this line of arguement is to re-examine the driving force of morality, as in why the need for morality arises?

However, let's begin with this important question - What is morality? Referring to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, it refers to a code of conduct put forth by a society or a religious group or normatively refer to a code of conduct would be put forward by rational persons under specific conditions.

The agglomeration of individuals in societies can be argued as the driving force for the need for morality. Simply put, in order for society to function and for its members to thrive, there is a need for the latter to abide by a certain code of conduct so that his/her fellow members will benefit or will be free from harm. Take for instance the traffic code of conduct whereby drivers are exhorted to drive safely by keeping within speed limits. Clearly, the safety of the other members of the society is likely to be preserved if such a code of conduct is in place.

The arising of civil societies is seen as the apex in evolution of a society. There is a paradigm shift away from a more individualistic outlook to a more socially conscious perspective in as far as members are concerned. Thus, going by the London School of Economics definition of civil societies, a civil society is one which revolves around shared interests and values, whereby collective action is taken.

In essence, the society is seen as the driving force of morality for the simple reason that morality is seen as the means to the society's end (good).

Citations
1) The Definition of Morality. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-definition/

2) Definition of Civil Society. London School of Economics
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CCS/what_is_civil_society.htm

Friday, September 7, 2007

Concepts in peer to peer computing: A hierarchical model of file distribution in peer to peer networks through designation of sub-hubs



Abstract

The use of an algorithm to designate sub-hubs within a peer to peer network will help to lessen some of the problems that networks face i.e. excessive traffic within the network leading to situations such as upstream congestion, which results in the deterioration in performance of other softwares that upload information into the Internet. Besides, the sub-hubs will ensure that the file is being distributed throughout the network as the latter will be relatively free from the constraints of congestion. The algorithm is as follows:

1) Status of user node is determined in terms of percentage of file downloaded;
2) Scan the network for other nodes whose download status is of a certain percentage e.g. 10% greater than the user;
3) Generate a distribution curve of the other nodes over this percentage range;
4) Determine the highest frequency of nodes over the range (if the frequency of nodes over the range is determined to be too low, steps 2 to 4 is repeated, but the network is scanned for nodes whose download status range is greater than the current one e.g. 20% > 10%);
5) Designate these nodes as sub-hubs;
6) User will download from these sub-hubs;
7) else (download from any user irregardless of download status with the part of the file in demand)

Introduction

Peer to peer networks are a popular way to transfer files, and is quite likely, they will be here to stay for quite a long time. They are different from the traditional client-server system, adopting a more decentralised mode of file distribution whereby peers act as equal, merging the roles of server and clients. A number of peer to peer software are in popular usage, e.g. Bittorrent, Emule and many others. This is not to say that peer to peer file transfer is free of any problems of its own. The growth in peer to peer traffic results in network congestion. Upstream traffic congestion can occur in circumstances when a particular user within the network is uploading the file to a large number of peers. This results in a large upstream to downstream ratio. This will likely result in congestion in the upstream link. Interestingly, it has also been shown that 60% of all Internet traffic is being driven by peer to peer traffic (Briere and Hurley, 2007).

A hypothetical scenario and the solution

Consider the network in Figure A. One seed (red node) with 100% of the file is being swarmed by downloaders. The seed is swarmed by 2 downloaders (green nodes) with 90% of the file, 3 downloaders with 70% of the file (blue nodes), 4 downloaders with 20% of the file (brown nodes) and 5 downloaders with 10% (magenta nodes) of the file. There is high likelihood that the seed will experience upstream congestion with dire consequences in their respective networks. The aforementioned algorithm serves to reduce the likelihood of congestion through designation of sub-hubs. In figure B, you can see the frequency distribution of the nodes in terms of percentage of file downloaded. In Figure C, you will be able to see what the algorithm does, i.e. to designate sub-hubs in a hierarchical fashion. You will notice that instead of the seed supplying the file to everyone, it will instead supply the file to the 90% completed downloaders, and the latter will supply the file to the 70% completed downloaders, who will supply the file to the 20% completed downloaders, who will lastly supply the file to the 10% completed downloaders. It can be seen in a hierarchical sense, nodes with a certain percentage of file downloaded that are at the lower echelons of the hierarchy will act as sub-hubs, which can relieve upload traffic from the main hub (the seed or those who have nearly completed downloading the file). It should be noted that the nodes can progress through the hierarchy as a greater percentage of file is being downloaded with time.

Discussion

This algorithm, which can be adopted in peer to peer softwares, is suggested as one of the possible solutions to ease some of the problems inherent in networks with heavy peer to peer traffic. However, it is not really known at this point of time the speed of file download relative to the current peer to peer softwares in use. However, prediction is that the speed of download should be comparable vis-a-vis current peer to peer softwares. Firstly, it will be relatively freer from congestion problems as which is the case with current peer to peer software. Secondly, at each step of progression of download, a source of sub-hubs will increase the speed of file download. It has also been pointed out that one of the main concerns on peer to peer networks is that the speed of download slows down towards the end. However, it's still not known whether this algorithm will be able to address this problem. Finally, it can be seen that this algorithm retains the essential features of the mainstream peer to peer software, i.e. users upload and download files simultaneously, whereby they function as downloaders from sub-hubs above them in the hierarchy (in terms of percentage of file completed), whilst they themselves act as uploaders to users below them in the hierarchy.

Citations
Briere, D and Hurley, P. The Bleeding Edge. Networkworld.com